Right to take part in public life

      The right to take part in public life gives every person in Queensland the right to participate in public affairs without discrimination. Eligible people also have the right to vote and be elected at State and local government elections, and to access public service roles without discrimination.

      What the Act says

      This right is based on Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Australia ratified in 1980.

      Scope of the right

      While everyone in Queensland has the right to take part in public life without discrimination, this does not provide a right to a specific outcome from participation.

      The right to vote, be elected, and access public service roles is limited to eligible people. Eligibility is determined by factors such as  Australian citizenship, age, where a person lives, and for prisoners, their length of sentence (see section 106 of the Electoral Act 1992).

      The right to participate in public life may be limited, but only where it is reasonable and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality, and freedom.

      What is participating in public affairs?

      Public affairs includes the work and activities of governments in Queensland at state and local level.

      Examples of participating in public affairs or public life include:

      • being a member of parliament
      • voting in elections or referendums
      • participating in community consultations with government
      • attending and asking questions at a local council meetings
      • engaging in public debate or dialogue with representatives, either individually or as part of an organisation.

      Participation in public life is being involved in political affairs and processes and the workings of government. It does not include participation in community or social activities.

      Case examples

      Search cases

      Council ban limited right to participate in public life (Victoria)

      A resident and ratepayer had been an active member of the community for many years. He had been diagnosed with medical conditions including bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, an acquired brain injury, and a hearing impairment.


      After making thousands of complaints to the local Council, some of which were insulting and used offensive language, the Council prohibited him from entering any council-owned, occupied, or managed buildings. This prevented the man from participating in public Council meetings.


      At a tribunal hearing, the man successfully argued that the Council’s actions limited his right to participate in public life on a discriminatory basis (his impairment), and the tribunal found that the Council had less restrictive options available to deal with the problem.


      (Slattery v Manningham CC (Human Rights) [2013] VCAT 1869)


      This information is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice.

      Last updated: